alloy digital

Worth Investment Group — Current Site vs. Concept Redesign

Prospect: Worth Investment Group · Site: worth-investments.com (WordPress) · Evidence: Worth Investment Group — Discovery Findings.md (2026-06-25)

Honesty guardrail. Left = the measured problems behind each pin. Right = concept art (illustrative, not a live build). Lead with measured findings only — never claim the site is slow without field data to back it.

🔒 worth-investments.com

Current state · measured

1 2 3 4

Current homepage of Worth Investment Group

Live screenshot — Worth Investment Group's current homepage, captured at desktop resolution (2880×2000px). Click each numbered pin for the measured finding.

Mobile experience is slow for real users Measured

The mobile performance score is 60 — below Google's "good" bar, the band where real-user experience starts to degrade (measured via PageSpeed Insights / CrUX, 2026-06-19).

Source: Worth Investment Group — Discovery Findings.md

Mobile largest contentful paint is very slow at 18.0s Measured

Mobile LCP measures 18.0 seconds — far past Google's 2.5s "good" threshold, meaning the main content takes many seconds to appear on a phone, where most prospects first land (measured via PageSpeed Insights / CrUX, 2026-06-19).

Source: Worth Investment Group — Discovery Findings.md

Desktop is stronger but still under bar Measured

The desktop performance score is 71 — better than mobile but still below the 90 "good" line, so even fast-connection visitors see a sub-optimal load (measured via PageSpeed Insights / CrUX, 2026-06-19).

Source: Worth Investment Group — Discovery Findings.md

WordPress / Elementor page-builder overhead Measured

The site runs on WordPress with Elementor, a page-builder stack whose render and script weight is a primary contributor to the slow mobile LCP above (measured via PageSpeed Insights / CrUX, 2026-06-19).

Source: Worth Investment Group — Discovery Findings.md

🔒 worth-investments.com

Concept art · illustrative

Concept direction

One unified site — built around how buyers actually shop.

An illustrative redesign that resolves each measured finding below. Concept art — not a live build or quoted scope.

Findings, before → after

Finding 01

Mobile experience is slow for real users

NowThe mobile performance score is 60 — below Google's "good" bar, the band where real-user experience starts to degrade (measured via PageSpeed Insights / CrUX, 2026-06-19).

ConceptAlloy direction: a lean custom front-end that clears Google's mobile performance bar. (concept — illustrative).

Measured: Worth Investment Group — Discovery Findings.md

Finding 02

Mobile largest contentful paint is very slow at 18.0s

NowMobile LCP measures 18.0 seconds — far past Google's 2.5s "good" threshold, meaning the main content takes many seconds to appear on a phone, where most prospects first land (measured via PageSpeed Insights / CrUX, 2026-06-19).

ConceptAlloy direction: a build that renders the main content in seconds, not an 18s wait. (concept — illustrative).

Measured: Worth Investment Group — Discovery Findings.md

Finding 03

Desktop is stronger but still under bar

NowThe desktop performance score is 71 — better than mobile but still below the 90 "good" line, so even fast-connection visitors see a sub-optimal load (measured via PageSpeed Insights / CrUX, 2026-06-19).

ConceptAlloy direction: a desktop experience that clears the 90 "good" line. (concept — illustrative).

Measured: Worth Investment Group — Discovery Findings.md

Finding 04

WordPress / Elementor page-builder overhead

NowThe site runs on WordPress with Elementor, a page-builder stack whose render and script weight is a primary contributor to the slow mobile LCP above (measured via PageSpeed Insights / CrUX, 2026-06-19).

ConceptAlloy direction: replacing page-builder bloat with a purpose-built, lightweight stack. (concept — illustrative).

Measured: Worth Investment Group — Discovery Findings.md